Categories: Tennessee Business NewsTennessee NewsTennessee Real Estate

CoreCivic Sues Consulting Firm Over ICE Contract Dispute

News Summary

CoreCivic, a private prison operator, has filed a $500 million lawsuit against Universal Strategic Advisors, alleging unethical acquisition of an ICE contract. The consulting firm, which had previously assisted CoreCivic, terminated their agreement and successfully secured a contract with ICE for non-detention services. This legal battle raises serious ethical concerns regarding conflicts of interest and the handling of confidential information in the competitive immigration detention sector.

Tennessee – CoreCivic, a private prison operator based in Brentwood, is suing the consulting firm Universal Strategic Advisors for $500 million, alleging that the firm improperly acquired a contract for non-detention services with federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The lawsuit was filed in the Metro Nashville Circuit Court this year and raises serious questions about ethical conduct and competitive practices within the immigration detention services sector.

CoreCivic, which currently manages four prisons in Tennessee, claims that Universal Strategic Advisors, contracted for $30,000 per month, acted unethically by terminating their agreement and subsequently submitting a similar contract proposal to ICE, which they ultimately secured for $73 million. This dramatic turn of events occurred after the firm had been paid $1.56 million over the course of a one-year contract intended to assist CoreCivic in winning a contract to provide administrative support related to undocumented immigrants.

According to court documents, CoreCivic enlisted US Advisors’ help to manage individuals released from detention due to humanitarian grounds, bond, or parole. The objective was to enhance the operational capabilities of ICE as deportations increased during the Trump administration. However, in early February, just a month into their notice of termination, US Advisors informed CoreCivic of their intent to end their contract after a notice period of 30 days. By March 2025, CoreCivic was informed that US Advisors had not only terminated their contract but had also submitted a proposal to ICE independently.

The connection between the two parties raises significant ethical concerns. Tim Robbins, the CEO of US Advisors, previously served in various leadership roles within ICE and reportedly maintained connections with CoreCivic’s vice president, Bart Verhulst. This relationship provided Robbins with potential access to CoreCivic’s confidential information, enabling US Advisors to create a competing proposal intending to enter the Department of Homeland Security market.

CoreCivic had been actively pursuing opportunities with ICE, having submitted proposals for case management services in 2023. The company resubmitted these proposals in August 2024 and January 2025, with indications from ICE that they were interested in CoreCivic’s offerings. However, the company was blindsided when US Advisors won the ICE contract shortly after terminating the agreement with CoreCivic.

The lawsuit, now in the legal system, seeks not only financial restitution but also highlights troubling issues such as potential conflicts of interest, the implications of confidential information sharing, and standards of conduct in the consulting industry. The relationship and the events surrounding the contract disputes exemplify the fierce competition and controversy surrounding contracts for immigration detention services.

This case stands to raise broader questions about the ethics involved in public contracts associated with immigration. As CoreCivic pushes forward with its lawsuit, the implications for future contracting and consulting within the immigration enforcement landscape remain significant, particularly as public and private interests intertwine amidst increasing scrutiny of how immigration policies are enforced.

As this case develops, it will be crucial to observe how it influences practices not just within CoreCivic or US Advisors, but also across the wider sector that engages with federal agencies like ICE. Legal experts and industry stakeholders will undoubtedly watch closely, as this lawsuit could set important precedents pertaining to ethical behavior, competition, and operational integrity in handling immigration-related contracts.